Fort Collins

Colorado Springs

Justice Scalia’s Impact on Marijuana Laws: What Could Have Happened in the Colorado Weed Lawsuit

The recent lawsuit between Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Colorado, which could potentially challenge the legality of marijuana in Colorado, has raised questions about how the late Justice Antonin Scalia might have ruled on the matter. Scalia, known for his strong stance on states’ rights and privacy, significantly impacted marijuana laws nationwide during his tenure on the Supreme Court.

Scalia’s opinions on privacy issues directly influenced the evolving landscape of marijuana laws. In 2001, he ruled that law enforcement could not use thermal imaging devices without a warrant to detect marijuana growers from a distance. In 2013, he asserted that police could not employ drug-sniffing dogs to incriminate individuals for marijuana cultivation in their homes without first obtaining a search warrant.

However, it’s important to note that Scalia’s opinions in these cases primarily focused on an individual’s right to privacy rather than the broader question of marijuana’s legality. When Scalia visited Colorado in 2014, he was questioned about the conflict between Colorado’s marijuana and federal laws. In response, he invoked the Supremacy Clause, which allows federal law to supersede state law. Furthermore, Scalia ruled against medical marijuana (MMJ) patients in a 2005 case, asserting that the federal government could prosecute them.

Had Scalia been alive to participate in the lawsuit challenging Colorado’s marijuana laws, his opinion might have tilted the scales against legalization. Legal scholars speculate that if the Supreme Court had decided to hear the case rather than dismiss it, Scalia’s vote could have resulted in a 5-4 decision against marijuana legalization. His strict adherence to a constitutionalist approach and the presence of the Supremacy Clause might have led to the dismantling of Colorado’s marijuana industry.

However, predicting how any specific Supreme Court Justice would rule in a given case is challenging, and the political landscape surrounding marijuana has been evolving in favor of legalization. With Scalia’s passing, the case may have resulted in a 4-4 tie, allowing the lower court’s ruling to stand and preserve Colorado’s marijuana industry.


In conclusion, Justice Antonin Scalia’s constitutional law legacy profoundly impacted various legal issues, including marijuana laws. While his strict interpretation of the Constitution and his invocation of the Supremacy Clause could have posed a significant challenge to Colorado’s marijuana industry, the ever-changing landscape of marijuana legalization makes it challenging to determine definitively how he might have ruled. Scalia’s contributions to the legal field will continue to be debated and studied in the future.

Suppose you or someone you know is facing DUI or drugged driving charges in Denver or Colorado. In that case, our experienced DUI defense lawyers at Thomas & Ahnell, LLC, are here to provide legal guidance and support. Contact us today for a consultation.

Do you have further questions or concerns? Call us or contact the attorneys at Thomas & Ahnell, LLC, and we will be happy to help.

Skip to content