Fort Collins

Colorado Springs

Make America Green Again? Will a Trump Administration Affect Colorado Marijuana?

The intersection of politics and the marijuana industry is poised to become an increasingly contentious battleground in the coming years, with the new presidency of Donald Trump casting a cloud of uncertainty over the future. While the President has displayed a somewhat ambivalent stance towards marijuana legalization, recent appointments signal a potential shift in federal policies that could impact states’ rights in this arena.

In the 1990s, Donald Trump expressed a perspective that diverged from mainstream conservative views, stating that legalizing all drugs could be a viable strategy in the War on Drugs. He argued that cutting the profits of drug czars would be an effective way to combat the issue. However, as a presidential candidate, Trump’s stance evolved, particularly in the context of marijuana legalization. In an interview with the Washington Post in October of the previous year, he voiced support for medical marijuana, unequivocally stating that it was something to be kept at 100 percent. On the recreational front, however, he opted for a more reserved approach, advocating for states to have the autonomy to decide their marijuana policies.

Despite Trump’s seemingly flexible stance, there is a growing concern among marijuana enthusiasts, as his choice for attorney general raises questions about the federal government’s future approach. Jeff Sessions, the appointed attorney general, hails from Alabama and is renowned for his vehement opposition to marijuana in all its forms—both medical and recreational. Sessions has characterized marijuana as “a real danger” that should not be underestimated. As the head of crucial agencies like the DEA, FBI, and U.S. attorneys, Sessions possesses the potential to wield significant influence over federal policies related to marijuana.

The prospect of Sessions leading the charge against marijuana legalization has left many in the industry on edge, as his appointment seems to conflict with the notion of states’ rights championed by Trump during his campaign. The contradiction between the President’s laissez-faire stance on recreational marijuana and his selection of an attorney general with a history of anti-marijuana sentiments has created palpable tension within the cannabis community.

The upcoming years promise an intriguing debate as the federal government navigates its stance on marijuana legalization. The delicate balance between respecting states’ rights and enforcing federal laws may become a defining issue for the Trump administration. As advocates and opponents prepare for this unfolding saga, the marijuana industry finds itself at a crossroads, where the decisions made at the federal level could significantly impact its trajectory.

One potential scenario is that states with legalized marijuana may face increased federal scrutiny and potential intervention under the leadership of Sessions. The clash between state and federal laws could lead to legal challenges and a reevaluation of the delicate balance struck in recent years. Marijuana enthusiasts and industry stakeholders must stay vigilant, actively engaging in advocacy efforts to protect the hard-fought progress achieved on the state level.


In conclusion, the evolving landscape of marijuana legalization under the Trump administration raises complex questions about federalism, states’ rights, and the future of the cannabis industry. The dichotomy between Trump’s past statements and his appointments introduces an element of unpredictability, leaving both proponents and opponents of marijuana legalization anxiously awaiting the unfolding developments in this high-stakes political and legal arena. As the nation grapples with the intricacies of marijuana policy, only time will reveal the true impact of the Trump era on the burgeoning cannabis industry.

Do you have further questions or concerns? Call us or contact the attorneys at Thomas & Ahnell, LLC, and we will be happy to help.

Skip to content